http://sirroxton.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] sirroxton.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mik3cap 2004-03-25 08:06 am (UTC)

Nah, Richard Clarke was just the head of a committee. The chiefs were working on a draft, and suggested that Clarke go work on the deputy level.

The deputies felt that Al-Qaeda was tied in with a host of other issues, and that instead of handling this threat separately, it should be included in the package of a long series of meetings to formalize an appropriate Iraqi policy.

Clarke was so annoyed at the bureaucracy that he resigned and decided to work on cyber-terrorism instead.

It's worth pointing out that what was known was very shallow. The original attack was originally thought to be months earlier, which was later thought to be postponed for an indeterminate series of months. Further, they didn't know where the attack would take place; the most likely target was thought to be Israel. Shit, talk about pre-emption! Attacking Al Qaeda before 9/11 would probably have been widely frowned upon. The only thing we had to go on was the sinking of the Cole, and assignment of responsibility to Al-Qaeda was just a preliminary opinion, just like Oklahoma was originally thought to be caused by foreign terrorists.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org