http://sirroxton.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] sirroxton.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mik3cap 2006-07-15 11:28 pm (UTC)

Well, all that means is that a law which excluded sterile people would be constitutional. Just like a law that excludes gays is constitutional.
(27 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.