on 2004-03-25 06:42 am (UTC)
Sorry, I thought that was the header of the MoveOn posting.

Bush doesn't pull this stuff out of his ass. Yeah, he gets mixed signals and probably has some latitude to choose. You can fault him for (perhaps criminally) bad judgment.

But this Clarke thing has nothing to do with that. For a while, Bush drifted on the back of Clinton-era policy decisions with regards to the Middle East. Clarke suggested that more aggressive action was needed, and the Bush administration was slow to effect change, although the gears were turning.

Hard to blame any president for siding on the side of non-escalation. I mean, look at the Cold War. There were all kinds of high-level strategic voices yelling for an attack on Cuba, because intelligence reported that they didn't have nuclear warheads yet. Intelligence was wrong, and if we'd done that, the worst would have happened.

Shit, what if we had ramped up aggressive action against Afghanistan and the planes had hit the towers in that light. That would have made the administration look criminally responsible, doncha think?

-Adam
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

mik3cap: (Default)
mik3cap

June 2010

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 7891011 12
131415 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 02:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios