on 2004-03-25 08:06 am (UTC)
Nah, Richard Clarke was just the head of a committee. The chiefs were working on a draft, and suggested that Clarke go work on the deputy level.

The deputies felt that Al-Qaeda was tied in with a host of other issues, and that instead of handling this threat separately, it should be included in the package of a long series of meetings to formalize an appropriate Iraqi policy.

Clarke was so annoyed at the bureaucracy that he resigned and decided to work on cyber-terrorism instead.

It's worth pointing out that what was known was very shallow. The original attack was originally thought to be months earlier, which was later thought to be postponed for an indeterminate series of months. Further, they didn't know where the attack would take place; the most likely target was thought to be Israel. Shit, talk about pre-emption! Attacking Al Qaeda before 9/11 would probably have been widely frowned upon. The only thing we had to go on was the sinking of the Cole, and assignment of responsibility to Al-Qaeda was just a preliminary opinion, just like Oklahoma was originally thought to be caused by foreign terrorists.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

mik3cap: (Default)
mik3cap

June 2010

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 7891011 12
131415 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 01:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios