Dec. 27th, 2007

mik3cap: (Default)
The first major film studio since Disney is now in partnership with Apple, signifying that the computer maker's dominance in the media delivery business is official. Not only will iTunes begin delivering content from 20th Century Fox; new Fox DVDs will have FairPlay (Apple's DRM) embedded in them (for "easy ripping" to iTunes). Apple is also rumored to be in talks with Time-Warner, Paramount, and SONY(!) though I have a hard time believing that last one.

What does this mean to the average movie-downloading consumer? Here's a comparison:

MethodRental cost per movieTime per download
"Pirate" torrents$0.0024-48 hours
Movielink$0.99-$3.995-10 minutes
Amazon unbox$0.99-$3.995-10 minutes
Netflix instant watching$1.25-$2.005-10 minutes
Cable on demand$2.99-$5.991-2 minutes


Rumors are pegging iTunes rentals to be at the bottom of this list, probably on par with cable on demand prices and Unbox/Netflix time to download. Content-wise, cable companies have a huge advantage, as their long standing deals to deliver new movies just after they're out of the theaters gives them the freshest stuff. Unbox has a lot more to choose from than Netflix, but nearly anything can be found on the Internet if a user is persistent enough searching for torrents. Content is king though, and Apple understands that better than anyone, I would think.

Apple is playing catchup, but has a huge advantage in the mobile market with iPhones and iPods everywhere. SONY is left in the dust with the failure of Universal Media Disc (UMD) and their never-was Connect service, and the PSP is an also-ran compared to the iPod. Amazon is partnered with TiVo and thus has a good delivery mechanism for the Unbox service, which apparently works well enough for many big studios (including SONY), but it is limited to TiVos and PCs that run the proprietary Unbox player.

Where does high-definition come in? HD downloads will probably take three to five times longer than the above estimates. People with HD cable boxes, satellite recievers, HD TiVos, and Apple TVs hooked up to their giant HD sets will have the easiest time getting HD content, though will likely be paying premium costs in time and money until probably the end of 2010. It will still be possible to download HD torrents, unless the cable companies get a technical innovation to eliminate P2P traffic or manage to lobby net neutrality out of existence - but this is only an option for tech and net savvy users who hook their computers up to their HDTVs, successfully search for what they want, and are willing to wait days for the downloads.

Microsoft is nowhere to be seen. They aren't leveraging Media Player or any special DRM in any way. Their Zune player isn't a contender. No deals with studios have been announced or even rumored. This is highly unusual, and you can bet they're working on something, but they're so far out of the field they might not even be able to play no matter what they spend to get back in.

More details to come in a couple of weeks when the full details come from the Macworld expo.

EDIT: Added Movielink, a studio backed online movie venture recently bought by Blockbuster, to the charts. Impact is similar to, though of less magnitude than, Netflix.
mik3cap: (Default)
I'm never going to Barnes & Noble again. The Strand is way, way better... I could spend hours upon hours in there just pawing through cool old books. And the prices are much better than any other retail bookseller I've been to. I'm totally an antiquarian bibliophile.
mik3cap: (Default)
I've been paying $59.95 a month for standard Road Runner service - apparently the cost of this service was reduced to $44.95 as of 10/1/2007. Unfortunately for me, I don't get paper statements and wasn't notified! So I paid $60 a month for two extra months, and if I hadn't stumbled upon this price change on their web site I'd still be getting charged an extra $15.00.

I called Time Warner/Road Runner and got a customer service rep; when I explained the situation, they not only reduced my service to the lower rate, the rep gave me a $29.95 rate for the exact same cable Internet service for six months. So I'm now saving about 40% on my Internet access next year... but I'm kind of pissed off, and also suspecting that they're suppressing my packets. I'm getting < 4Mbps download at peak hours; I'm wondering if I can do better for $450 worth of Internet access next year. I don't get FIOS in my area yet, sadly.

Profile

mik3cap: (Default)
mik3cap

June 2010

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 7891011 12
131415 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 15th, 2025 12:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios