Online Video Price War
Jan. 13th, 2008 07:26 pmNetflix will be announcing unlimited movie streaming tomorrow, according to AP.
http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/U/UNLIMITED_NETFLIX?SITE=WIRE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-01-13-13-19-22
This is effectively the opening salvo of a streaming video price war. Not necessarily the smartest move on Netflix's part for a couple reasons: decreased profits, and a lower bound they cannot break. In other words, there are no more than 480 hours in a month; when you charge a monthly subscription fee, it will always be divided against that number. Realistically though, there needs to be a more accurate base number... 480 hours assumes that a person sleeps eight hours a day, and does nothing but stream movies while awake. This is a highly unrealistic upper bound.
So let's be more conservative and real. Let's take Netflix's highest level of service - 8 DVDs, 48 hours of instant watching time at $48 a month. They probably have the data to show that very, very few people watch more than 1 two hour movie a day, which is why they don't offer a service plan with more instant watching hours. But let's be conservative and assume that 95% of Netflix customers will watch no more than 150 minutes of video a day, or 4500 minutes a month. In fact, let's make the math easy and say it's 4800 minutes a month - that means that the least their highest frequency watcher will pay is $1 per 100 minutes of unlimited streaming online video with their current pricing. But that's their highest level of service... if unlimited streaming is offered to the $17 a month customers, and their movie watching habits increase to the same level as the top level customers, you've now made this number more like $0.35 per 100 minutes. It's pretty unlikely that anyone will watch that much; and it would take over ten years to watch everything in their online catalog at that rate.
This is more likely a reaction to Amazon Unbox and Movielink as much as it is to Apple's alleged online video service. How low will they all go? Where will the market bottom out?
http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/U/UNLIMITED_NETFLIX?SITE=WIRE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-01-13-13-19-22
This is effectively the opening salvo of a streaming video price war. Not necessarily the smartest move on Netflix's part for a couple reasons: decreased profits, and a lower bound they cannot break. In other words, there are no more than 480 hours in a month; when you charge a monthly subscription fee, it will always be divided against that number. Realistically though, there needs to be a more accurate base number... 480 hours assumes that a person sleeps eight hours a day, and does nothing but stream movies while awake. This is a highly unrealistic upper bound.
So let's be more conservative and real. Let's take Netflix's highest level of service - 8 DVDs, 48 hours of instant watching time at $48 a month. They probably have the data to show that very, very few people watch more than 1 two hour movie a day, which is why they don't offer a service plan with more instant watching hours. But let's be conservative and assume that 95% of Netflix customers will watch no more than 150 minutes of video a day, or 4500 minutes a month. In fact, let's make the math easy and say it's 4800 minutes a month - that means that the least their highest frequency watcher will pay is $1 per 100 minutes of unlimited streaming online video with their current pricing. But that's their highest level of service... if unlimited streaming is offered to the $17 a month customers, and their movie watching habits increase to the same level as the top level customers, you've now made this number more like $0.35 per 100 minutes. It's pretty unlikely that anyone will watch that much; and it would take over ten years to watch everything in their online catalog at that rate.
This is more likely a reaction to Amazon Unbox and Movielink as much as it is to Apple's alleged online video service. How low will they all go? Where will the market bottom out?