I can't view the movie here at work but the still picture of the mother with the kid is freaky. I'd think it was computer generated but it's obviously not.
From what I got from the article there is only one kid, she just has two heads. So even if they were moving independently, it was the one girl doing all of it.
Don't think so. My understanding is that it was a twin that didn't develop a body. If the twin's head didn't have it's own brain, I doubt it'd be able to blink and smile.
There was a another twin on top of that. Makes you wonder if the mother was taking or perhaps abusing fertility drugs.
And you know how parents like to show naked bath photos of their kids? How'd you like to be this kid... "hey Manar, I saw your freak head picture on the INTERNET..."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ninetydegrees
no subject
on 2005-02-21 05:54 am (UTC)Nature rocks!
At least it's not about penises
on 2005-02-21 06:20 am (UTC)*shudder*
Re: At least it's not about penises
on 2005-02-21 07:36 am (UTC)Re: At least it's not about penises
on 2005-02-21 08:03 am (UTC)There was a another twin on top of that. Makes you wonder if the mother was taking or perhaps abusing fertility drugs.
Re: At least it's not about penises
on 2005-02-21 08:19 am (UTC)Re: At least it's not about penises
on 2005-02-21 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
on 2005-02-21 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
on 2005-02-21 06:25 am (UTC)