mik3cap: (Default)
[personal profile] mik3cap
Looks like fingerprint smudging on iPhones was enough of a problem that Apple actually created a fingerprint resistant coating on the iPhone 3Gs. I wonder if they got requests from government and security people for that as well?

on 2009-06-10 06:10 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] l0qii.livejournal.com
Most of the govt type people I know can't even own iPhones because they aren't allowed to bring cameras in to work.

on 2009-06-10 06:26 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] kaetaur13.livejournal.com
I heard something similiar where people bought low tech phones just so they could have them in the office for child emergencies.

on 2009-06-10 08:26 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Ah, but now there is remote wiping, and I swear I heard the words "hardware encryption" during the keynote...

on 2009-06-10 09:05 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] neuromancerzss.livejournal.com
The problem isn't that pictures could be stolen from your phone, it's that you could take pictures and sell them.

on 2009-06-10 09:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Yes, but a paranoid employed can wipe your phone every time you exit the building and have you restore it from a secure location...

on 2009-06-10 09:26 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] neuromancerzss.livejournal.com
And prevent cell phone calls and file transfer so you don't just transfer them elsewhere? At that point what does the phone actually do?

on 2009-06-10 09:35 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Internal applications that are distributed ad hoc within the organization? Like managing inventory. Or performing some other kind of productivity tasks.

iPhone isn't a phone. It's a mobile computing platform with a phone attached to it.

on 2009-06-10 09:54 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] neuromancerzss.livejournal.com
The already have mobile computing platforms with neither a phone nor a camera attached. Those things are drawback for this function. Hell, if you really want to stay in-brand for some reason an iPod Touch is basically an iPhone without the phone or camera.

on 2009-06-10 10:31 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
True, but the ease of use of the iPhone/iPod interface and the extremely rapid development cycles for iPhoneOS applications are compelling reasons to use the platform. I imagine remote wiping will also work fine with iPod touch over WiFi... I'm sure there's a way to do that too.

Profile

mik3cap: (Default)
mik3cap

June 2010

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 7891011 12
131415 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 07:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios