Jun. 18th, 2008

OKCupid

Jun. 18th, 2008 01:28 pm
mik3cap: (Default)
OKC has some puzzles and IQ type tests now. They're about to launch a new quiz engine that's all pretty and AJAX and shit.

I played this one memory game and got 28 correct - Genius level 4!!

http://www.okcupid.com/puzzles/memory
mik3cap: (Default)
This topic is starting to intrigue me.

Batman made Joker by dropping him in a vat of goo. Iron Man made a whole bunch of bad guys using his tech. Superman "made" Lex Luthor bald, but mostly his very existence just pisses Lex off enough to inspire him to be bad (same with Reed Richards and Dr. Doom). The Hulk made all his villains by inventing his gamma technology.

But it wasn't always this way, right? There were days when Supes and Bats and other heroes just fought criminals who were already bad. They didn't create their own nemeses. And there are plenty of heroes who didn't necessarily create their own rogue's galleries; though a potential Superman-style "inspiration" argument can be made in many cases by saying that super-villains just appear once superheroes appear.

When was the turning point for this? Is there a clearly defined time period we can point to which shows when comic book heroes started making their own villains - post-WWII maybe? Are there classical mythological or literary references one can cite where heroes make their villains? Arthurian legend leaps immediately to mind (fathering Mordred), as does Norse mythos (Fenrir the wolf being just one example). Is it simply a case of the comic storytelling medium maturing and creating more complex stories, or does this say something else about how we perceive or define heroism (and villainy!) and how that changes over time?

Profile

mik3cap: (Default)
mik3cap

June 2010

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 7891011 12
131415 16 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 1st, 2025 11:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios